AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Equal protection of law2/28/2024 ![]() 737 Exactly what procedures are needed to satisfy due process, however, will vary depending on the circumstances and subject matter involved. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.ĭue process requires that the procedures by which laws are applied must be evenhanded, so that individuals are not subjected to the arbitrary exercise of government power. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. A "rational basis-plus" standard may involve greater attention to the legitimacy and importance of the government interest.SECTION 1. However, the Supreme Court appears to apply a "rational basis-plus" standard to laws that seem to discriminate against certain groups, such as the LGBTQ+ community, children of undocumented foreign nationals, and people with mental disabilities. A law generally will survive a rational basis challenge, in which the burden is on the challenger rather than the government. In these situations, the law will be upheld as long as the classification is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. Rational basis review applies to all other classifications, which are not viewed as suspect. The footnote suggested greater scrutiny for laws that appear to violate the Bill of Rights, laws restricting political processes that are used to change laws, and laws that single out religious, national, or racial minorities. ![]() However, footnote 4 in the opinion may have planted the seed for elevated standards of review in other types of cases. US, the Supreme Court upheld an economic regulation under rational basis review. A law may or may not survive this standard of review. Under intermediate scrutiny, the government needs to identify an important (rather than compelling) government interest and prove that the law is substantially related (rather than necessary) to serving that interest. Intermediate scrutiny applies to the quasi-suspect classifications of gender and illegitimacy. ![]() This is a challenging standard to meet, and a law usually does not survive strict scrutiny. The law must be narrowly tailored and use the least restrictive means to further that interest. Strict scrutiny requires the government to identify a compelling government interest and prove that the law is necessary to serve that interest. It also applies to certain classifications that impose burdens on fundamental rights, including marriage, procreation, voting, moving between states, and access to courts. First, strict scrutiny applies to classifications based on race, national origin, religion, and alienage. Standards of Review in Equal Protection CasesĬourts may apply three standards of review in equal protection cases. However, the Supreme Court has indicated that these proxies for racial classifications stand on equally uncertain constitutional ground. As challenges to affirmative action have grown, some public entities have replaced these programs with race-neutral programs that are based on characteristics that tend to correlate with race. This involves giving certain minority groups advantages in processes controlled by the government, such as competitions for government contracts or admission to public universities. Scholars are divided on whether the equal protection doctrine permits affirmative action. Possibly sexual orientation, although the Court has not directly addressed this issueĬharacteristics that are not considered suspect classifications for equal protection purposes include age and poverty.Additional classifications subject to enhanced review include: It has been interpreted to prohibit race discrimination against any minority group, rather than just African-Americans, and it applies to discrimination against groups defined by traits other than race. However, the equal protection doctrine has expanded far more broadly over time. Board of Education, which struck down school segregation. Perhaps its most famous application occurred in the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. The Equal Protection Clause initially was intended to prevent government discrimination against African-Americans in the wake of the Civil War. Therefore, it also applies to actions by the federal government. While the Fourteenth Amendment applies only to the states, this principle has been "reverse incorporated" into the Fifth Amendment, which contains a Due Process Clause. Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the government from denying the equal protection of the laws to any person.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |